![]() MERGED – merge result, this is what gets saved in the repo ![]() REMOTE – file you are merging into your branch LOCAL – this is file from the current branchīASE – common ancestor, how file looked before both changes Step 2: Run following command in terminal git mergetool This will set vimdiff as the default merge tool. Step 1: Run following commands in your terminal git config merge.tool vimdiff Kdiff3, tkdiff, xxdiff, tortoisemerge, gvimdiff, diffuse,Įcmerge, p4merge, araxis, vimdiff, emerge.īelow is the sample procedure to use vimdiff for resolve merge conflicts. One of the following tools to use it instead: meld, opendiff, Running git mergetool for me resulted in vimdiff being used. It is much better than doing the whole thing by hand certainly.ĭoesn't necessarily open a GUI unless you install one. Sometimes it requires a bit of hand editing afterwards, but usually it's enough by itself. It opens a GUI that steps you through each conflict, and you get to choose how to merge. In order to force changes back to the central repo. Per Charles Drake in the comment to this answer, one solution to remediate the problem is: git checkout master That does not mean the branches are the same, because you can have plenty of changes in your working branch and it sounds like you do. According to merge there are no new changes in the parent since the last merge. Your branch is up-to-date with respect to its parent. The label for the “test” branch should be somewhere below your “master” branch label. Use gitk to take a look at your repository. Congratulations, that’s the easiest merge you’ll ever do. More specifically it means that the branch you’re trying to merge is a parent of your current branch. Hopefully this quick note might help someone who found themselves in the same position as me.The message “Already up-to-date” means that all the changes from the branch you’re trying to merge have already been merged to the branch you’re currently on. It seems to be safe and to sort out the issue of ‘Your branch is ahead of ‘origin/master’ by x commits’. This will fetch and merge the current branch from the remote to my local branch- and also update my local tracking branch – origin/mybranch – to point to the latest commit – and – it will pull the remote master branch into origin/master and merge that into your local master branch. The thing is – I was being too clever and trying to avoid pulling and updating master. It says everything is up-to-date – but you get the horrible ‘Your branch is ahead of ‘origin/master’ by x commits’ message – WTF!ĮDIT: What this is saying is that your local master branch is ahead of your local copy of the remote master branch – origin/master – which you’ve just pulled down.ĮDIT: Your local master branch must have new commits which you had not pushed to origin. Which updates your local mybranch nicely. You have a remote repository and push some code updates to it from a local repository – you then switch to a different local repository and pull down the updated code from the remote repository with: This is an annoyingly simple issue – so simple that it may not be blogged elsewhere.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |